|
Title : Seasons of TV series are getting shorter and shorter. Does this mean they are better? Keywords : seasons, TV series, short, quality Summary : |
In recent years, seasons of television series seem to be getting shorter, but does this reduction in length guarantee increased quality? This development questions the impact of the length of seasons on the quality of series. Through this analysis, the aim is to explore whether this trend towards shorter seasons positively influences the narration and the appreciation of spectators.
Reducing the Number of Episodes: A Boost for Quality?
In the past, TV series offered extended seasons, often including up to 22 episodes. Today, it is not uncommon for new productions to not exceed eight episodes per season. This change raises the question of whether greater conciseness means better quality.
Narrative Economy and Efficiency
Reducing the number of episodes allows creators to focus on more concise and direct storytelling. This can result in an elimination of the famous “filler episodes” which often dilute the narrative tension.
For example, series like Stranger Things And The Mandalorian are acclaimed for their constant tension and sustained pace.
Character Development
A shorter season doesn’t necessarily mean less character development. Series like “Fleabag” or “Watchmen” have proven that it is possible to create a deep connection with the audience in a small format.
Having fewer episodes forces writers to optimize every minute of screen time, often for the benefit of richer stories and characters.
Creative Pressure and Innovation
The pressure to produce more episodes has sometimes forced the creators to explore unexpected directions. In traditional series like “The Sopranos” and “Breaking Bad,” some of the most memorable episodes probably wouldn’t have happened without this flexibility in length.
Comparison between Long and Short Seasons
| Long Seasons | Short Seasons |
| More time to develop complex story arcs | More direct and concise stories |
| Risk of filling episodes | Focus on the essentials |
| Opportunity for secondary character development | Focus on the main characters |
| Potential for more innovation through time constraints | Sustained and constant rhythm |
| Greater production effort for creators | Less production pressure |
Effects on Fans and the Industry
For viewers, shorter seasons can mean better short-term satisfaction with less time invested for a complete story. However, this can also lead to a lack of long-term attachment to the characters.
In production, compact seasons reduce costs and allow greater flexibility for showrunners and actors.
List of Key Points
- Shorter seasons promote more focused storytelling
- Less room for filler episodes
- Intense development of the main characters
- Limited potential for narrative innovation
- Reduced production costs
FAQs
Why have TV series seasons become shorter?
Streaming platforms favor shorter formats to maximize engagement and reduce production costs.
Yes, but this can be both an advantage and a disadvantage. Fewer episodes often mean richer development of the main characters, but may neglect supporting characters.
No, some complex narratives benefit from longer seasons to explore various story arcs and aspects.
Not necessarily. Some “filler episodes” can add depth to the characters and world of the series.
Not systematically. Quality depends on the storytelling and overall execution, not the number of episodes.
Yes, they can increase completion rates due to the lower time commitment required from viewers.